By Gail Gegg Rosenberg
Educational Audiiology Association Newsletter, Winter 1997
A classroom teacher’s most important instructional tool is his or her voice (LaCoste, 1996). Research has shown that teachers, as a profession, exhibit a significantly higher incidence of vocal problems than is evident in the general population (Crook & Langdon, 1974; Sargent, et al., 1980) Crandell and Smaldino (1995) surmise that vocal problems experienced by teachers may be attributed, at lease in part, to the need to increase vocal output to be heard by students over the classroom noise.
Teachers with a history of vocal pathology, vocal problems (i.e. those related to vocal stress, allergies, etc.), and reduced pulmonary function can be helped in preserving their most important instructional tool by using an FM Soundfield amplification system. Classroom teachers participating in the Improving Classroom Acoustics special project undoubtedly recognized that saving their voice was their greatest benefit obtained when using FM Soundfield amplification. The 55 teachers completing an evaluation form were unanimous in their "strongly agree" response that the Soundfield system saved their voices (Rosenberg, Blake-Rahter & Heavner, 1995). LaCoste (1996) recommends that the first priority in placing FM Soundfield amplification in classrooms in a school should be given to teachers with voice problems.
How, then, can these teachers perform as self-advocates to ensure that an FM Soundfield system will be available to them in their classrooms? The following suggestions may be useful to assist teachers in protecting their most valuable teaching tool and continuing to enjoy their chosen profession.
The advocacy role of the educational audiologist is evident in each of these suggestions. We have an important responsibility to educate teachers, administrators, physicians, risk management coordinators, and other service providers abut the benefits of FM Soundfield amplification for teachers with vocal problems.
References
Crandell, C. & Smaldino, J. (1995). Speech perception in the classroom. In Crandell, Smaldino & Flexer (Eds.), Sound-field FM amplification: Theory and practical applications, pp. 29-48. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.
Crook, M. & Langdon, F. (174). The effects of aircraft noise in schools around London airport. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 34, 221-232.
LaCoste, M. (1996). Wiring teachers for sound. Principal.
Rosenberg, G., Blake-Rahter, T. & Heavner, Jr. (1995, November). Enhancing listening and learning environments with FM Soundfield classroom amplification. Paper presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association annual convention, Orlando, FL.
Sargent, J., Gidman, M., Humphreys, M. & Utley, W. (1980). The disturbance caused by schoolteachers to noise. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 62, 277-292.
The information you receive online from Marrs-Study.Info is protected by the copyright laws of the United States and other countries. The copyright laws prohibit any copying, redistributing, retransmitting, or repurposing of any copyright-protected material. The content, appearance and navigation of this page may not be copied or altered in any way.